Skip to content
Stark Insider
  • Culture
  • Filmmaking/Tech
  • Atelier Stark Films
Independent Film News

Netflix vs. Cannes is the tip of the disruption iceberg for re-defining TV and film

BY Clinton Stark — 04.12.2018

Blue Ruin - Cannes and Netflix
Outstanding indie 'Blue Ruin' (2013) was helped by a strong showing at Cannes.

What is TV?

It’s 2018 and I’d say the term is pretty much antiquated. After all, juggernaut Netflix premiers big budget original films on its platform. Some people watch them on televisions. But many more watch them on laptops, smartphones and other streaming-compatible devices. So is it “TV” or a “film” or just “streaming content”?

Of course definitions are important. Especially for top tier, influential film festivals like Cannes. A good showing in France for an indie film typically results in good distribution deals, and, ultimately, positive box office awards; not to mention that all-important element of prestige that only Cannes (and possibly TIFF) can bring these days.

By now, we all know that Netflix has pulled out of Cannes 2018. The move is in retaliation for treating Netflix films — and they’re definitely films, ones with directors and actors and writers and producers — essentially as second class citizens. Cannes ruled Netflix films would not be eligible for competition. Because they aren’t released theatrically in France, they’re not able to compete for the Palm d’Or or other prizes. Antiquated thinking? I’d say so. But given the influence and history of Cannes it’s no surprise that its organizers what do what it can to prevent the inevitable re-definition of film… and TV, from shaping their festival on their own turf.

It’s not much of stretch to suggest the war between Netflix and Cannes is emblematic of a larger shift. That is the one away from traditional theatrical release cycles — the one that’s driven Hollywood for decades — to one that is streaming-based and on demand. There’s many players here including Amazon, Google (YouTube), Hulu among others. Just that roster of names likely warrants a nose in the air response from French aristocrats.

Ultimately, though, its small-time filmmakers who lose. Why hurt their chances at distribution and viewership just because their release platform of choice (and, likely, only choice) was a streaming service like Netflix?

I suspect this is just the tip of the iceberg known as disruption. Negotiations will happen. Eventually something will happen to placate all parties. At least I hope. After all, shouldn’t it be the art form itself that is celebrated and critiqued, and not the technology behind getting it in front of audiences?

Related Stories

Still from Poetic License, the opening night film at the 2026 Sonoma International Film Festival directed by Maude Apatow

Sonoma Film Festival 2026: Wine Country Meets Serious Cinema

Independent Film
Scene from The President’s Cake — Lamia (Baneen Ahmad Neyyef) speaks with a vendor while holding a rooster in an Iraqi market.

The President’s Cake — a haunting portrait of Iraq’s marshlands

Independent Film
Chantal Akerman’s Jeanne Dielman prepares a meal in real time in her minimalist kitchen

Will Generative AI Kill Slow Cinema?

Cameras & Filmmaking
Heretic and Gen AI filmmaking credit debate

'Heretic' Credit: "No Generative AI was used in the making of this film."

Independent Film

More in Independent Film →

Clinton Stark

Filmmaker and editor at Stark Insider, covering arts, AI & tech, and indie film. Inspired by Bergman, slow cinema and Chipotle. Often found behind the camera or in the edit bay. Peloton: ClintTheMint.

Short Films
Loni Stark - A West Coast Adventure - A Lifetime in the Making - Stark Insider

Stark Insider
  • CULTURE
  • BEST OF AI
  • FILMMAKING/TECH
  • ATELIER STARK FILMS
  • HUMANxAI SYMBIOSIS
THE STARK COLLECTIVE
  • THE STARK CO
  • STARK INSIDER
  • STARKMIND
  • ATELIER STARK
© Copyright 2005-2026 BLG Media LLC. v2.18.1
  • Review Policy and Shipping
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • About