Sony Alpha a57 DSLR: Does it crush the Canon EOS 60D?

The a57 can shoot much faster than my EOS 60D: 10 fps. vs. 5.3 fps. Ouch, that's a big difference. Should I dump the 60D in favor of the a57?

a57 vs. 60D

a57 vs. 60D

The new Sony Alpha a57 DSLR lands next month. How does it compare to the Canon EOS 60D, and – most importantly – which is the better camera?

I’m a multi-generational Canon guy. You know how that works; your grandfather passes down lenses, a TL1 , an old camera bag, and then your father teaches you the ropes on an AE-1. Lickity split, I’m a Canon guy. It could’ve just as easily been Nikon. Likely I’d be happily snapping away, adjusting stuff in Lightroom and endlessly cutting in Premiere Pro.

a57 vs. 60D
Canon EOS 60D with Rode Videomic Pro: Ready for some run 'n gun.

Historically it’s always been Nikon vs. Canon.

Sony is trying to change that. I like their approach. Rather than play by the existing DSLR rules, the new Sony Alpha a57 seeks to change the game. The new model hits stores next month for $799 with 18-55mm kit lens (Sony has a preorder page now up). It’s not a DSLR in the conventional sense. There is no optical viewfinder. Instead, Sony uses an impressive sounding electronic version. Couple that with mirrorless action (“translucent mirror technology”), and you have an interesting alternative to the conventional models out there such as the T3i, 60D, and Nikon’s D5100.

There’s a few things that immediately grab my attention with the a57.


The a57 can shoot much faster than my EOS 60D: 10 fps. vs. 5.3 fps. Ouch, that’s a big difference. If you’re into sports photography or have mere seconds to capture a subject, then the Sony could give you a leg up.

Low light

The a57 performs better in low light. I often shoot at events – film festivals, foodie events, inside theaters – where light is sparse. Flashes to me are the enemy; almost more so than complete darkness. I don’t like the artificial look they typically create, and carrying extra gear is a pain. The a57 tempts with its impressive (at least by the specs) ISO limit of 16,000. Holy smokes. 60D maxes out at 6,400. Until the in-depth tests come out, however, we won’t know for sure what kind of quality we can expect from the a57. On paper, though, this is a win for Sony over Canon.

Auto focus in video mode

The a57 has an intriguing auto-focus mode that enables the camera to lock on a subject. This is a new feature we’re seeing more often in DSLRs (Nikon D3100). In the past, the lack of auto-focus in video mode was perhaps one of the main reasons why video camcorders were the preferred choice for shooting non-film based projects (where you don’t have the benefit of stopping and pulling focus, and editing in post). Also, with 15-point AF the a57 beats the 60D’s 9-point system.

Other things I like are the video-specific video light Sony is making available as an accessory (I believe for around $170). Also,like the 60D, the LCD articulates, which is tremendously handy for those moments when you feel the need to go Tarantino framing your next shot.

You can see here in this segment I shot with the 60D that I actually try to use the lack of auto-focus to my advantage- “It’s my style, man!” (said with carefree Neil Young drawl). Results are admittedly mixed!

But Danny Boyle uses Canon (7D, 5D – 127 Hours)!

In its defense, the 60D has a 18 megapixel sensor, versus 16.1 on the a57.

I prefer Canon’s mov format for video over the a57’s AVCHD which has given me problems in the past (from a Vixia camcorder in Premiere Pro).

Specs are one thing, and don’t necessarily translate into market share (i.e. iPad vs Android Tablets). I’ll be keeping my eye on (they’ve already published an informative a57 preview) to see how if real world performance delivers.

For now I’m still a Canon guy. That’s unlikely to change anytime soon. Not for ideological reasons mind you. When you have decades of investment – glass, know how, accessories – changing camps is never a decision to take lightly. With the a57, Sony is pushing the envelope, and stirring up the DSLR pot.

Explore. Create. Live. Follow Stark Insider on Twitter and Facebook. Join our 9,000 subscribers who read SI on tablets and smartphones on Google Newsstand. Prefer video? Subscribe to 
Stark Insider on YouTube, the largest arts & travel channel in San Francisco.
  • guest

    Have you looked at Sony’s A65 with has also 10FPS But with 24 megapixels at a similar price  

    • Thanks for the tip. Seems like dpreview had good things to say about the A65: 

      “Quite apart from its 24MP sensor, the A65’s OLED EVF, full-time live view system and 10fps continuous shooting mode are unmatched by its more conventional DSLR peers, and when you add the well thought-out ergonomics to that formula you end up with a camera that deserves both your attention, and our highest award.”

  • adhib97

    You also forgot that the Sony has in body image stabilization, that a big plus because every lens you attach will be stabilized.

    • Good point. Agreed that is a big plus!

      • adhib97

        To be honest, I wouldn’t go for the A57, I would get either the A65 or the A77, or wait for the A900 (Full Frame) Successor. You can’t go wrong with a Sony, the only thing a Sony lacks in is lenses, but you can get the older Minolta lenses with AF, so for example a Sony DT 50mm F1.8 is around £100-120, the older Minolta version the 50mm F1.7 is a tad cheaper at around £80-£100. So technically the Sony will have just as many lenses as a Canon or a Nikon.

  • TableTop Studio

    One big benefit of Canon DSLR cameras vs Nikon, and as far as I can tell all the Sony DSLR cameras, is that all of the Canon DSLR cameras, from the T3 on up, include not just the ability for tethered shooting, but also the required software and cable as part of the initial purchase.

    While tethered shooting (the ability to control the camera and preview images on a computer) is probably not useful for shooting video, it is awesome for shooting still shots in the studio. So if someone is considering a Sony for shooting stills in a studio setting, they should investigate whether the Sony allows for tethered shooting.

    Most of the Nikon cameras, from the 5100 up, allow for tethered shooting, but they also require additional software, which normally costs over $175).