Why must electric cars – Volt, Prius, Insight, Leaf – look like alien fish?

And let's leave those minuscule tires for the clown cars.

2011 Chevrolet Volt - the least likely to be confused with an Alien Fish.
2011 Chevrolet Volt - the least likely to be confused with an Alien Fish.
2011 Chevrolet Volt - the least likely to be confused with an Alien Fish.
2011 Chevrolet Volt - the least likely to be confused with an Alien Fish.

Electric cars are finally reaching the main stream, albeit very slowly. Sometimes I stare across the highways at those huge stacks pumping out plumes of smoke and junk that comes from who knows where and ends up who knows where (well, Al Gore knows… and it almost rhymes with auto-zone).

So we’ve been thinking electric. Maybe a Toyota Prius, or a Honda Insight.

For a sports car-loving guy these things don’t exactly light my world. But they make so much sense, especially given the miles we’re putting on these days; up and down 101 to Palo Alto, San Francisco, then up to Berkeley and a round-trip or two to Napa and Sonoma. Repeat.

But, I have to wonder: why must electric cars look like alien fish?

Is this odd design we see from all of the manufacturers by choice or by necessity (maybe to accomodate battery arrays)? Can’t they just take stock car designs — all well and good — and make hybrid or electric editions without adding funky fenders, strangely sloped roof lines, and el junko in the trunko? And let’s leave those minuscule tires for the clown cars.

Reading this back to myself so far tells me that I still need to wean myself off traditional car thinking, aka the combustion engine. I’m sure–at least I hope–there is a good reason for all of this.

Trigger - low wind co-efficient.
Trigger - low wind co-efficient.

The car I’m most interested in now (if I momentarily pretend sports cars don’t exist) would be the new Chevy Volt. For a few reasons.

First, I’m very pleased this is a progressive, American engineered car. I hope it’s a hit, and gives GM a new lease on life (at least for three years).

Secondly, the styling is half-way respectable. It has some attitude, what with the aggressive grill and somewhat neatly stylized rear quarters. It’s more expensive than the competition, but you can get up to $7,500 in federal tax credits.

Road test are trickling out now for the Nisan Leaf (all electric) and Chevy Volt (electric + gas) so it will be interesting to see how they fare.

But, when it comes to styling I still wish it felt like we’re driving these cars on planet Earth and not Neptune. Hang on a sec, I found my skinny leather tie… this might work out after all.

Explore. Create. Live. Follow Stark Insider on Twitter and Facebook. Join our 9,000 subscribers who read SI on tablets and smartphones on Google Newsstand. Prefer video? Subscribe to 
Stark Insider on YouTube, the largest arts & travel channel in San Francisco.
  • Chris G

    Nice headline. Made me laugh this morning.

    Better would be not needing a car but that’s a different story.

  • I thought I read somewhere that consumers who buy eco-friendly cars wanted them to look different than the regular gas-guzzling variety.

    Agree it still doesn’t justify why they must look like underwater aliens. Could be even more wicked looking than the average car. Perhaps such design aesthetics, along with the re-engineered engine, would put it at a price-point that is not commercially viable.

    As electric cars go from a market of early adopters that want to stand out, to the mass market, more “normal” looking varieties will proliferate.

  • Randon

    “plums” of smoke? really?

    • Uh… no – now that would be a story. Oops! Plumes, actually.

  • ffinder

    Check out this beauty! the Renault Fluence Z.E. (Zero Emissions)

    photos:

    http://www.autoblog.com/photos/renault-fluence-zero-emissions-concept/

    This beauty is to be sold at a price lower than $20,000 BEFORE incentives.

    http://green.autoblog.com/2009/12/21/better-places-renault-fluence-ev-to-sell-for-under-20-000/

    ff